Yes. I'm really sorry. http://code.google.com/codejam/rules.html *Collaborating With Other Participants*
*You are not allowed to collaborate with other participants or with anyone else, for that matter, during a contest. This includes discussing, sharing,or posting the problem statements or solutions. Any contestant found cheating or attempting to cheat will be disqualified.* On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Ruturaj Dhekane <[email protected]> wrote: > nope > he had taken my code just to pass..is there a problem? > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Andriy G. Tereshchenko < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Ruturaj Dhekane, >> >> Are both accounts Geekru2 and navjot yours? >> >> -- >> TAG >> >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ruturaj Dhekane <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I woke up early in morning, and saw welcome problem. >>> I quickly wrote a recursive solution uploaded small set, wrote an >>> optimized DP for large and left for college without uploading large..while >>> cycling it struck me something is wrong! %1000! I came back later changed >>> it, and uploaded. >>> >>> I was so tensed at night, that I forced myself to attempt other problems. >>> Luckily welcome was correct, and others were just a point bonus. >>> >>> I heard later that many others in my college failed large due to their >>> %1000. >>> >>> I still need to check on my B2, cause B1 went through easily, and B2 gave >>> me some non ascii character!! :( god knows why.. >>> >>> anyway hope we dont make such errors in next rounds!! >>> >>> enjoy! and code! >>> Regards >>> Geekru2 >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:07 PM, ashish khurana < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey ya right friends, even m having the same problem, I solved the code >>>> mathematically, then implemented it, and m sure that my loops are not >>>> infinite, still they keep on running in case of large input files for >>>> hours... :-( >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Bartholomew Furrow >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Bey >>>>> Your algorithm sounds right, but there are lots of small ways in which >>>>> it could be wrong. I'd suggest going to "View my submissions," >>>>> downloading >>>>> your input file and your output file, and then downloading the winner's >>>>> code >>>>> and running it on the input. Compare that output to your output, and >>>>> you've >>>>> found a case that exercises your bug... it's all debugging from there. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Bartholomew >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Bey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> I noticed that there are a large number of people who go the small >>>>>> input correct for prob C but not the large input. I was wondering why >>>>>> that might be. I am one of those people. I think I applied Dynamic >>>>>> Programming, and it worked on the small input, but not the large >>>>>> input. I still can't figure it out. Does anyone know why a lot of >>>>>> people are in the same lot? Basically, I think I am counting the >>>>>> number of ways so far of being in one of the 18 states, of having >>>>>> observed 'w', 'we', 'wel' etc. And then I write out the number of >>>>>> ways of being in the 18th state at the end. Why do I fail on large >>>>>> values? I also mod everytime I add numbers. >>>>>> >>>>>> What is going on? Did you fail on large input too? Did you figure out >>>>>> why? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> [Geekru2] >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Andriy G. Tereshchenko >> Odessa, Ukraine >> >> >> >> > > > -- > [Geekru2] > > > > -- -- Andriy G. Tereshchenko Odessa, Ukraine --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
