I actually used the first paragraph as a test case. If you copy&paste
the first paragraph, it has exactly 400263727 occurrences of "welcome
to code jam" as a substring, as mentioned on the second paragraph. I
think that test was strong enough for any code.

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Paul Smith<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Should this discussion really be happening in public?
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Ruturaj Dhekane<[email protected]> wrote:
>> but cant my rank be considered, also my past performance at GCJ?
>> Since I havent copied?
>>
>> this will be really heartbreaking!
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Andriy G. Tereshchenko <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. I'm really sorry.
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/codejam/rules.html
>>> Collaborating With Other Participants
>>>
>>> You are not allowed to collaborate with other participants or with anyone
>>> else, for that matter, during a contest. This includes discussing, sharing,
>>> or posting the problem statements or solutions. Any contestant found
>>> cheating or attempting to cheat will be disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Ruturaj Dhekane <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> nope
>>>> he had taken my code just to pass..is there a problem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Andriy G. Tereshchenko
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ruturaj Dhekane,
>>>>>
>>>>> Are both accounts Geekru2 and navjot yours?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> TAG
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ruturaj Dhekane <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I woke up early in morning, and saw welcome problem.
>>>>>> I quickly wrote a recursive solution uploaded small set, wrote an
>>>>>> optimized DP for large and left for college without uploading 
>>>>>> large..while
>>>>>> cycling it struck me something is wrong! %1000! I came back later changed
>>>>>> it, and uploaded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was so tensed at night, that I forced myself to attempt other
>>>>>> problems. Luckily welcome was correct, and others were just a point 
>>>>>> bonus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I heard later that many others in my college failed large due to their
>>>>>> %1000.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I still need to check on my B2, cause B1 went through easily, and B2
>>>>>> gave me some non ascii character!! :( god knows why..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> anyway hope we dont make such errors in next rounds!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> enjoy! and code!
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Geekru2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:07 PM, ashish khurana
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey ya right friends, even m having the same problem, I solved the
>>>>>>> code mathematically, then implemented it, and m sure that my loops are 
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> infinite, still they keep on running in case of large input files for
>>>>>>> hours... :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Bartholomew Furrow <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bey
>>>>>>>> Your algorithm sounds right, but there are lots of small ways in
>>>>>>>> which it could be wrong.  I'd suggest going to "View my submissions,"
>>>>>>>> downloading your input file and your output file, and then downloading 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> winner's code and running it on the input.  Compare that output to your
>>>>>>>> output, and you've found a case that exercises your bug... it's all
>>>>>>>> debugging from there.
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Bartholomew
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Bey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>> I noticed that there are a large number of people who go the small
>>>>>>>>> input correct for prob C but not the large input. I was wondering
>>>>>>>>> why
>>>>>>>>> that might be. I am one of those people. I think I applied Dynamic
>>>>>>>>> Programming, and it worked on the small input, but not the large
>>>>>>>>> input. I still can't figure it out. Does anyone know why a lot of
>>>>>>>>> people are in the same lot? Basically, I think I am counting the
>>>>>>>>> number of ways so far of being in one of the 18 states, of having
>>>>>>>>> observed 'w', 'we', 'wel' etc. And then I write out the number of
>>>>>>>>> ways  of being in the 18th state at the end. Why do I fail on large
>>>>>>>>> values? I also mod everytime I add numbers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is going on? Did you fail on large input too? Did you figure
>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>> why?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> [Geekru2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andriy G. Tereshchenko
>>>>> Odessa, Ukraine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> [Geekru2]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Andriy G. Tereshchenko
>>> Odessa, Ukraine
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> [Geekru2]
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Smith
> http://www.nomadicfun.co.uk
>
> [email protected]
>
> >
>



-- 
Piva

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to