Sergey,

You don't need to know why/how S(63,7,3) is possible, just know that it IS.

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Sergey Ochkin<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The problem statement looks quite clear to me. Specifically, it tells
> that every test case in input file is "solvable", which means that
> there is an algorythm for determining the lowest floor where the egg
> breaks...
> However I discovered an inconsistency in the first (small) input file.
> It contains the following test case: 63 7 3.
> I simply do not believe that it is possible to determine the lowest
> crash-floor in a 63-floor building with only 7 drops and 3 breaks!
> Can anyone give a hint if I am mad or the test case is incorrect?
> --
> On Sep 8, 5:45 pm, Paul Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The sample input has 2 test cases.  The first, 3 3 3, tell you that
>> Solvable(3,3,3) is true. So, you are asked,
>>
>> what is the maximum number F such that Solveable(F,3,3) is true,
>> what is the minimum number D such that Solveable(3,D,3) is true,
>> what is the minimum number B such that Solveable(3,3,B) is true.
>>
>> The answer for this case is 7 2 1, as S(7,3,3), S(3,2,3) and S(3,3,1)
>> are all true.
>>
>> Similarly, given that S(7,5,3) is true, S(25, 5, 3), S(7,3,3) and
>> S(7,5,2) are all true, 7 5 3 -> 25 3 2
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:48 PM, LeppyR64<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm having trouble understanding the problem statement.
>>
>> > I understand what is expected for output, but not how to get from the
>> > sample input to the output.
>> > Could someone please explain the sample test case?
>>
>> --
>> Paul Smithhttp://www.nomadicfun.co.uk
>>
>> [email protected]
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to