Paul,

That makes sense and I appreciate it!  That's what I was missing.  Cheers!


On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Paul Smith<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> No.  With 3 drops, allowing 3 breaks, you can test 7 floors.  3,3,3
> doesn't come into the solution, it's just a starting point.
>
> You drop the first egg at floor 4.  If it breaks then you try floor 2
> next, else you try floor 6.  The 3rd egg goes either at floor 1, 3, 5,
> or 7.  It's a simple binary search.
>
> (The implicit assumption is that if an egg breaks on floor 4, it will
> also break on any higher floor.  If an egg does not break on floor 4,
> it will also not break on any lower floor)
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Jason Lepack<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't understand how 7 is achieved for max F in the first test case.  
>> Since S(3,3,3) is true, it is determined that within three drops, allowing 3 
>> breaks, it's known whether or not the egg will break at all floors less than 
>> or equal to 3.  Right?
>>
>> The leap to 7 is foggy for me.  I could see the answer being 6, as with 
>> three drops we could check 4,5, and 6.
>>
>> I know i'm missing something but I don't know what it is.  I'll admit it's a 
>> little frustrating ;)
>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Smith <[email protected]>
>>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:45:39
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [gcj] Re: Egg Drop
>>
>>
>>
>> The sample input has 2 test cases.  The first, 3 3 3, tell you that
>> Solvable(3,3,3) is true. So, you are asked,
>>
>> what is the maximum number F such that Solveable(F,3,3) is true,
>> what is the minimum number D such that Solveable(3,D,3) is true,
>> what is the minimum number B such that Solveable(3,3,B) is true.
>>
>> The answer for this case is 7 2 1, as S(7,3,3), S(3,2,3) and S(3,3,1)
>> are all true.
>>
>> Similarly, given that S(7,5,3) is true, S(25, 5, 3), S(7,3,3) and
>> S(7,5,2) are all true, 7 5 3 -> 25 3 2
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:48 PM, LeppyR64<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm having trouble understanding the problem statement.
>>>
>>> I understand what is expected for output, but not how to get from the
>>> sample input to the output.
>>> Could someone please explain the sample test case?
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Smith
>> http://www.nomadicfun.co.uk
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Smith
> http://www.nomadicfun.co.uk
>
> [email protected]
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to