I agree. If regionals onsite are not possible, maybe arrange more contests before the onsite finals would be interesting.
Víctor On Feb 4, 7:33 am, CaustiQue <[email protected]> wrote: > As for me, there's no important reason to consider all requests, and > it would be better to know final schedule as soon as possible > nevertheless someone won't be pleased. > > Since GCJ is free of charges, organisers have a right to determine > their rules independently. I think, TopCoder is a good example. > There's an announcement on its page with expected dates of rounds: > "These dates are subject to change with or without notice until the > official announcement of the TCO happens at the end of March. Please > note we will only change dates if it is necessary for our schedule and > we will not be changing any dates per member requests". > > As for number of participants on finals, I agree with Luke Pebody: > it'd be rather better to arrange more contests instead invite on the > onsite round more contestants. > > Cheers, > Igor. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-codejam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
