I happen to agree with Deebashis Roy here.
I would like to be able to attempt for the large input several times as
well.
I am fine with having a maximum limit on that though, like if you can allow
only 5 attempts or something of that sort, that would be fine too.

But overall considering the fact that I am not one of the top coders out
there :), I would really like to get more chances to try the large input
once I know that my algorithm isn't great and there is scope of improvement,
or if I know that I have to convert my algorithm to a faster language like
C/C++.

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:27, TripleM <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wouldn't interpret it that way at all. It makes perfect sense to me
> - it is extremely easy to have a tiny bug in your algorithm that
> invalidates your entire effort. These tiny mistakes are picked up in
> the small submissions; once you have got that correct you are expected
> to be able to solve the large input without any further help.
>
> On May 21, 5:25 pm, Debashis Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The format of the contest doesn't look very fair, given the fact that a
> person can submit the small data set multiple times in case of incorrect
> result but cannot re-submit the large data set in case of time outs.
> >
> > To me, the small data set is more to check the accuracy of the algorithm
> whereas the large data set is to check the efficiency of the algorithm.
> >
> > If that is true then what gcj is saying translates to "we will allow you
> to correct your algorithm if you have an incorrect algorithm, but we will
> not allow you to improve upon your algorithm if you have an inefficient
> algorithm!!!"
> >
> > Any particular reason for this? :-)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Debashis
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Climate, controversies and the changing signatures of naturehttp://
> green.in.msn.com/
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-codejam" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-code%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "google-codejam" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<google-code%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
>
>


-- 

Thanks & Regards,
Dhruva Sagar.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.

Reply via email to