I agree with bigonion. There are zillions of problems with analysis on the internet from all different contests. There are hundreds (around two hundreds) problems from previous years of Codejam with analysis.
Also important that QR problems have the least possible relevance for solving R1 problems the same year. Nobody expects organizers to put "Cookie Clicker Beta" or "Minesweeper Slave", meaning that puzzles for Q1 are more likely to be from some other area of algorithms. When I was asking for publishing analysis sooner (I did that), I was mostly interested in first page - authors of problems, number of contestants, general feelings of organizers about the round. This small piece I truly would like to hear before next round of contest, but it is still up to organizers. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-code/3cf915fb-0852-49da-8eb4-2b4350456753%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
