I agree! (String and Jerome) :) Testing is problematic when they are not consistent versions rendering the gadgets.
On Mar 3, 11:00 am, "Jerome (Guru)" <[email protected]> wrote: > This is great, guys, pretty nice list so far. ;-) > > Yes, Gmail should clearly be listed as a gadget container, even though > this is half baked in my opinion. Not having a way to set user prefs > is making this pretty much unusable. > > Good list as well Vision. Now this is getting a bit scary, as this > means a lot of testing if we want to make sure we cover all these > properties... > > Jerome > > On Mar 3, 2:29 am, String <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 2:17 am, Vision Jinx <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think Gmail also now IIRC > > > Definitely GMail, with certain limitations: width is limited to ~160px > > (depending on theme), and the settings UI is inaccessible. > > > A little-known one is GMaps; the Mapplets API is roughly the union of > > the Maps and Gadgets APIs. As such, virtually any iGoogle gadget can > > be installed in the sidebar of maps.google.com, and some are actually > > quite useful there. > > > And don't forget all the OpenSocial containers, for gadgets coded to > > the gadgets.* namespace. Don't know if you'd want to count that or > > not, it could be argued that's a different API (that doesn't work on > > production iGoogle for example). > > > String --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
