Hi Ty, Do you have an example page where these are embedded?
Thanks, Dan On Sep 8, 11:23 pm, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > We have a similar issue with our gadgets newly migrated to gadgets.* > > All works OK on iGoogle; however the gadgets appear blank on > syndication including Google Toolbar Buttons. In particular, we're > getting the following javascript error: > > 'gadgets.util' is null or not an object > > I'll give you three live xmls... all with the same problem, throwing > js error and blank screens on syndication: > > http://bit.ly/8S67Rhttp://bit.ly/e7EJXhttp://bit.ly/Hxydg > > Thank you > > Ty > > On Sep 1, 4:45 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks, Dan. I appreciate you looking into it. Looking forward to > > hearing back from you. > > > E > > > On Aug 31, 7:58 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > To avoid keeping you waiting too long: I'm able to reproduce your > > > issue, and it would appear that there is some incompatibility between > > > opensyndicationand Analytics. I'm working with the Analytics team to > > > try and figure out the best workaround, and will report back when I > > > have more details. > > > > Thanks, > > > Dan > > > > On Aug 27, 5:47 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Dan. I've had good success migrating the gadget except for one > > > > issue: attempting to adopt the Analytics API for gadget tracking > > > > (http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/ > > > > gadgetTracking.html). It works well when my gadget is on iGoogle, so > > > > it's very possible the problem is on my end. An error only occurs > > > > when the gadget is insyndication, despite the fact the Analytics API > > > > lists OpenSyndicationas one of its supported containers. > > > > > The error I get in my Firefox Error Console is a simple: "_IG_GA is > > > > not defined." > > > > > My gadget spec can be found > > > > at:http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/114281111391296844949/dri... > > > > and a sample syndicated instance of the gadget is > > > > at:http://kalafarski.com/directions/dev/ > > > > > On Aug 17, 10:30 am, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks, Dan. Will do. > > > > > > E > > > > > > On Aug 10, 7:17 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Yesgadgets insyndicationalso supportgadgets.*. Pleaselet me know > > > > > > if you encounter any problems during the migration. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > On Aug 7, 6:34 am, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Given that we've learned the legacy API will be deprecated > > > > > > > eventually, > > > > > > > I've begun exploring migrating our existinggadgets togadgets.*.> > > > > > > > > > > > However, thegadgets.* developer'sguide does NOT > > > > > > > mentionsyndication > > > > > > > as a supported container forgadgets.* gadgets. Issyndication > > > > > > > supported by gadgets.*? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
