Thanks, Dan. Regarding the toolbar issue, should we wait for you to come back with an update or is there another contact that we should sync with to follow it up. If the gadget is OK and the bug is on the container/ renderer, this means that soon we will have many toolbar buttons go blank as developers continue to migrate to gadgets.*
On Oct 1, 9:18 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Oct 1, 7:49 am, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dan, > > > Thanks for the reply. I see the embed option works fine when you > > change "ig" to "gadgets"; however, this is not a change that we can > > make: Users access the "http:// > > p8f4e7ltqfl2k83ak14j9sopdhb170qa.open.gmodules.com/ig/creat..." > > creator page when they click on the "Embed this gadget" link on the > > lower right corner of the gadget details page in the iGoogle Directory > > (http://bit.ly/Bd2Oiinthis case). So by default, Google is > > dispensing the code with "http://www.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=";. If > > this is a bug on the creator page, are you planning to update these > > links there? > > Yes, I have filed a bug internally to fix this. > > > > > In any case, changing the url may not be the best option since we have > > many users already embedded the "http://www.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url="; > > codes in their web pages. They won't know to replace "ig" with > > "gadgets" in their code.. so it would be ideal if we could get the > > existing "ig" link to work. Any chance of fixing that bug? > > I will request that this is changed as well. > > > > > Also, equally important, the migrated gadgets.* do not work on Google > > Toolar as a gadget button. For example, please try adding one of the > > Toolbar buttons athttp://bit.ly/2GEv0, you will notice that they > > appear blank as they do on the syndication page. They used to work > > (i.e. display the gadget contents) just fine when written in legacy > > _IG. > > I'm not on the Toolbar team, so I don't have an answer for this one, > but I'll ask around. > > > > > > > Thank you > > > Ty > > > On Sep 30, 7:15 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Ty, > > > > It appears that this is a bug on the creator page, and not a bug in > > > the gadget. The iframe URL the creator page generates is creating a > > > reference > > > tohttp://p8f4e7ltqfl2k83ak14j9sopdhb170qa.open.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=...... > > > which is the legacy renderer that doesn't support gadgets.*. However, > > > if you change the path > > > tohttp://p8f4e7ltqfl2k83ak14j9sopdhb170qa.open.gmodules.com/gadgets/ifr...... > > > then the gadget works fine. Since this will affect the JS you embed in > > > your page, you should modify all references to *.gmodules.com/ig/ifr > > > to instead read *.gmodules.com/gadgets/ifr. > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > Thanks, > > > Dan > > > > On Sep 16, 6:10 am, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > Just checking to see if you got a chance to look into this. Thank you > > > > > Ty > > > > > On Sep 14, 1:05 pm, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > You asked about example pages where the three gadgets that I listed > > > > > above are embedded. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. > > > > > > Googel's "Add this gadget to your webpage" preview screen would be a > > > > > good place to start. For example, please take a look at the following > > > > > link > > > > > >http://bit.ly/cP2KP > > > > > > ... where the preview window appears empty with a "'gadgets.util' is > > > > > null or not an object" javascript error > > > > > > Hope this helps, please let me know > > > > > > Ty > > > > > > On Sep 12, 6:42 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Dan, I'm encountering another similar problem, this time only in IE. > > > > > > I've worked around the Analytics problem by using the old > > > > > > _IG_Analytics library until that problem is fixed, but in > > > > > > syndication, > > > > > > IE8's error message tells me that "gadgets" is not defined. As a > > > > > > result, the gadget breaks on load. > > > > > > > As before, my gadget spec can be found > > > > > > at:http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/114281111391296844949/dri... > > > > > > and a sample syndicated instance of the gadget is > > > > > > at:http://kalafarski.com/directions/dev/ > > > > > > > On Sep 10, 7:57 am, XU SHU <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if google did something or not, but now it is fixed > > > > > > > automatically. > > > > > > > Thanks very much for your help!! > > > > > > > > With best regards > > > > > > > Shu > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Dan (Google) > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Ty, > > > > > > > > > Do you have an example page where these are embedded? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > On Sep 8, 11:23 pm, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > > > We have a similar issue with our gadgets newly migrated to > > > > > > > > > gadgets.* > > > > > > > > > > All works OK on iGoogle; however the gadgets appear blank on > > > > > > > > > syndication including Google Toolbar Buttons. In particular, > > > > > > > > > we're > > > > > > > > > getting the following javascript error: > > > > > > > > > > 'gadgets.util' is null or not an object > > > > > > > > > > I'll give you three live xmls... all with the same problem, > > > > > > > > > throwing > > > > > > > > > js error and blank screens on syndication: > > > > > > > > > >http://bit.ly/8S67Rhttp://bit.ly/e7EJXhttp://bit.ly/Hxydg > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > Ty > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 1, 4:45 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Dan. I appreciate you looking into it. Looking > > > > > > > > > > forward to > > > > > > > > > > hearing back from you. > > > > > > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 7:58 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > To avoid keeping you waiting too long: I'm able to > > > > > > > > > > > reproduce your > > > > > > > > > > > issue, and it would appear that there is some > > > > > > > > > > > incompatibility between > > > > > > > > > > > opensyndicationand Analytics. I'm working with the > > > > > > > > > > > Analytics team to > > > > > > > > > > > try and figure out the best workaround, and will report > > > > > > > > > > > back when I > > > > > > > > > > > have more details. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 5:47 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan. I've had good success migrating the gadget > > > > > > > > > > > > except for one > > > > > > > > > > > > issue: attempting to adopt the Analytics API for gadget > > > > > > > > > > > > tracking > > > > > > > > > > > > (http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/ > > > > > > > > > > > > gadgetTracking.html). It works well when my gadget is > > > > > > > > > > > > on iGoogle, > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > it's very possible the problem is on my end. An error > > > > > > > > > > > > only occurs > > > > > > > > > > > > when the gadget is insyndication, despite the fact the > > > > > > > > > > > > Analytics > > > > > > > > API > > > > > > > > > > > > lists OpenSyndicationas one of its supported containers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The error I get in my Firefox Error Console is a > > > > > > > > > > > > simple: "_IG_GA is > > > > > > > > > > > > not defined." > > > > > > > > > > > > > My gadget spec can be found at: > > > > > > > >http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/114281111391296844949/dri... > > > > > > > > > > > > and a sample syndicated instance of the gadget is at: > > > > > > > >http://kalafarski.com/directions/dev/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 17, 10:30 am, skeeJay <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Dan. Will do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 7:17 pm, "Dan (Google)" > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yesgadgets insyndicationalso supportgadgets.*. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pleaselet me > > > > > > > > know > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you encounter any problems during the migration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 7, 6:34 am, skeeJay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Given that we've learned the legacy API will be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deprecated > > > > > > > > eventually, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've begun exploring migrating our existinggadgets > > > > > > > > togadgets.*.> > > > > However, thegadgets.* developer'sguide > > > > > > > > does NOT > > > > > > > > mentionsyndication > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a supported container forgadgets.* gadgets. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issyndication > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supported by gadgets.*?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
