Sites is also my choice for the moment, as I've too much hosted on Google.com in one form or another. I sort of like the extra freedom that Sites allows for customizing the page. But it does require work--putting a refresh script in each gadget, for instance, and messing around with web site construction. And many existing gadgets don't work well without the back end support that iGoogle provides. Few iGoogle aficionados will probably want to go to this much trouble just to get an aggregate of web feeds.
The lesson in all of this is probably not to put all of your eggs in one (cloud) basket. On Sunday, July 8, 2012 7:24:58 PM UTC-4, Chris Smith wrote: > > Another possible alternative... > > If Google isn't closing down "Google Gadgets" and if Google isn't closing > down "Google Sites". > > We should be able to make our personalized page or pages using a > combination of the two. > > example: > https://sites.google.com/site/clswebhome/ > > Regards, > > Chris > > On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 4:57:02 PM UTC-5, GONSALVR wrote: >> >> iGoogle gives a customized Tile layout of "live" widgets so you get >> updates of new emails, Remember The Milk [ To Do List ], weather, news, >> calendar etc. While adding an app to Chrome is simply shortcut to a >> webpage... hardly cutting edge 2012 technology. iGoogle is an ideal web >> portal for anyone serious about productivity >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/Google-Gadgets-API/-/6PNRUNzmT20J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en.
