Comment #8 on issue 809 by [email protected]: Guice Assisted Inject
with multiple implementations of interface
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=809
Ok - thanks for your response.
I would prefer to go with approach 1, the problem I see with second
approach is that it requires to unnecessarily create D along with B and C
and this would grow with new implementations.
Also, in case I need another implementation of A which requires different
parameters than B/C or D then this approach will get messy.
If there are no better ways, I will go with option 1.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
