On 10 сеп, 21:36, "Bob Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Let's not try to rush a release out on such short notice. "Summer 2008" was > just a random date we pulled out of our asses.
Agree. Let's better 2.0 be rock solid, since it will going to have a lot of press. > I know everyone is excited about 2.0, but we're in no danger of slipping > perpetually. We have a concrete, minimal list of features we plan on > including. We should take as much time as is necessary to polish and > document those features because it goes without saying, we will be stuck > with them indefinitely. That's why 2.0 beta/alpha is important. Doing 2.0 without a single prerelease will not get much testing of new features from the users. Random snapshots are just not enough. > We need to build some real extensions on top of the new features before I'll > be comfortable rubber stamping them. For example, I'd like to see a scope > validator and maybe even an update to our Eclipse plugin. > > As for the version number, this feels like a 2.0 to me. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
