On Sep 13, 2:41 pm, Kamil Demecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 3:33 pm, "Logan Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "runtime bindings"?
> > that doesn't sound good.
>
> I think it is the best solution to some type of problems, specialy if
> you need start up system, you dont have enough information at begin,
> and cant configure system injector in one step. I thought a lot of
> this problem and it is cool that hierarchical injectors provide
> solution to this. It is advanced feature and must be used with careful
> but is needed (imho mandatory).
I see that is another option described in
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice/msg/183947c897535e8b. I'm
curious if it is enough to this case, but hierarchical injectors seems
to me natural to this case.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
