Actually, a better example would be:
class A {
B b;
@Inject D d;
}
class B {
@Inject C c;
public void useC() {
c.doSomething();
}
}
I still call getInstance on A to Inject D.
On Sep 11, 1:17 pm, Pyrolistical <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, sorry bad example.
>
> Its more like:
>
> class A {
> B b;
>
> }
>
> class B {
> @Inject C c;
> public void useC() {
> c.doSomething();
> }
>
> }
>
> I don't have @Inject on B, because class A know B needs C Injected.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
