On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Pyrolistical <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have watched that, and I don't see why DI by hand is any worst than > Guice. Its solves all your main problems with testability. > If you write factories by hand, you end up writing and maintaining a lot of boilerplate code. > The ClientFactory in your DI by hand example is very similar to a > Provider in a Module for the Injector. > That's why you should only use custom providers in special cases. If you hand code providers everywhere, you won't leave Guice much to do. Bob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
