On Sep 15, 6:19 am, "Anthony MULLER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> interface ITotoService {
> IToto doSomething();
> }
>
> class TotoServiceImpl {
> Toto doSomething() {
> return ..... ;
> }
> }
Did you intend
class TotoServiceImpl implements ITotoService?
> Observe the return type of both methods.
Is it safe to assume that Toto implements IToto?
> I think Guice should not ask for invocation when a method is "synthetic"
> ("volatile", "bridge", ... any methods generated by compiler)...
I don't think there's any synthetic methods here. Could you
send an executable test case? I think I know what you're
getting at here but it's a lot easier to fix bugs with a test case.
Cheers,
Jesse
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
