Yep, TotoServiceImpl implements ITotoService and Toto implements IToto.
I will send you a minimal test case tomorrow...
Cheers,
Anthony
2008/9/15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sep 15, 6:19 am, "Anthony MULLER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > interface ITotoService {
> > IToto doSomething();
> > }
> >
> > class TotoServiceImpl {
> > Toto doSomething() {
> > return ..... ;
> > }
> > }
> Did you intend
> class TotoServiceImpl implements ITotoService?
>
> > Observe the return type of both methods.
> Is it safe to assume that Toto implements IToto?
>
> > I think Guice should not ask for invocation when a method is "synthetic"
> > ("volatile", "bridge", ... any methods generated by compiler)...
>
> I don't think there's any synthetic methods here. Could you
> send an executable test case? I think I know what you're
> getting at here but it's a lot easier to fix bugs with a test case.
>
> Cheers,
> Jesse
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
