Wow, somewhat unheard of for the commons libraries ;) On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:26 AM, James Carman wrote:
> > Take a look at the dependencies page for Commons Proxy: > > http://commons.apache.org/proxy/dependencies.html > > Nothing is required other than the JDK. Now, this is a bit > misleading. If you want to use any of the optional libraries (CGLIB > and Javassist), then you of course have to include their dependencies. > Commons Proxy manages its dependencies using Maven2, so it picks up > whatever CGLIB and Javassist say they need. > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> >> >> I'm not a big fan of most of the commons libraries. They tend to pull >> in a number of extra dependencies and most aren't JDK 5 converted >> yet. >> Plus, this would only be useful if the CGLIB dependency was opened up >> rather than pre-packaged. This commons library might be different, >> but >> my guess is that it still depends on commons-lang, commons-logging >> and >> maybe one more. I don't think that bundling CGLIB inside the JAR is a >> bad thing personally. >> >> -bp >> >> >> On Oct 16, 2008, at 11:42 PM, James Carman wrote: >> >>> >>> Would the Google Guice project be interested in using Apache Commons >>> Proxy (http://commons.apache.org/proxy/)? ACP basically allows >>> you to >>> create dynamic proxy objects using a standardized API without >>> worrying >>> about the underlying dynamic class library specifics. Right now, it >>> includes support for JDK proxies, Javassist, and CGLIB (no ASM yet, >>> but I imagine it could be done). >>> >>>> >> >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
