Thanks for the suggestion and the support. Bob
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:51 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm doing that now. Again, I'm not trying to cram Proxy down Guice's > throat or anything. I just thought it might be helpful. I know how > much I hated writing proxying logic code manually and hopefully > Commons Proxy's abstraction is intuitive enough to make it easy on > folks. If you guys do decide to use it and run into any problems, > just let us know via the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list (or you > can contact me directly if you have something that needs answering > quickly :). > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:42 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> What specific usage scenarios do you have that you think Proxy might > >> not support? If there's something that we have overlooked, we should > >> improve our library (even if guice doesn't want to use it). Have you > >> looked at the Commons Proxy API? > > > > I haven't, but the Guice code is fairly simple if you want to check. > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
