Ok This is not an AOP issue then, it is getting intercepted properly.
I am not sure what the problem is then--are you calling this method
from another transactional method?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Gili Tzabari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Here is my code sniplet:
>
> public class VideoResource
> {
> @DELETE
> @Transactional(rollbackOn = Exception.class)
> public Response deleteVideo()
> {
> Video video = mediaManager.getVideoById(id);
> // more code
> }
> }
>
> VideoResource is injected using @AssistedInject. MediaManager is
> injected using @Inject. When I trace into mediaManager.getVideoById() I
> see JpaLocalTxnInterceptor.invoke() -> em.getTransaction().isActive()
> returns false.
>
> I am using guice-snapshot20081123.
>
> Gili
>
> Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
>> Are you sure the @Transactional methods are not private?
>>
>> Im not sure, can you submit a test case, preferably extending one of
>> warp-persist's tests?
>>
>> If AOP interception works on assisted inject'ed classes then
>> warp-persist & @Transactional will work. Has anyone else seen a
>> problem with AOP and assisted-inject?
>>
>> Dhanji.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi Dhanji,
>>>
>>> I am seeing warp-persist silently ignoring method-level @Transactional
>>> on classes created using @AssistedInejct. Can you please confirm this
>>> and suggest a workaround?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Gili
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
http://twitter.com/dhanji
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
