AssistedInject doesn't play nice with AssistedInject. We're working on
this.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=131
On Nov 27, 10:41 pm, Gili Tzabari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [reposting bounced post]
>
> I just created totally new class. When I inject it using @Inject
> transactions are handled perfectly. When I invoke it using
> assistedinject they are not. The same method is being invoked in both
> cases. The only thing changing is the constructor and annotations. There
> is definitely some sort of problem mixing guice-assistedinject and
> @Transactional.
>
> I'm unsure how to exercise the warp-persist "codemoney" example but
> you should be able to reproduce this issue very easily on your end.
>
> Gili
>
> Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
> > Ok This is not an AOP issue then, it is getting intercepted properly.
> > I am not sure what the problem is then--are you calling this method
> > from another transactional method?
>
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Gili Tzabari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Here is my code sniplet:
>
> >> public class VideoResource
> >> {
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED](rollbackOn = Exception.class)
> >> public Response deleteVideo()
> >> {
> >> Video video = mediaManager.getVideoById(id);
> >> // more code
> >> }
> >> }
>
> >> VideoResource is injected using @AssistedInject. MediaManager is
> >> injected using @Inject. When I trace into mediaManager.getVideoById() I
> >> see JpaLocalTxnInterceptor.invoke() -> em.getTransaction().isActive()
> >> returns false.
>
> >> I am using guice-snapshot20081123.
>
> >> Gili
>
> >> Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
> >>> Are you sure the @Transactional methods are not private?
>
> >>> Im not sure, can you submit a test case, preferably extending one of
> >>> warp-persist's tests?
>
> >>> If AOP interception works on assisted inject'ed classes then
> >>> warp-persist & @Transactional will work. Has anyone else seen a
> >>> problem with AOP and assisted-inject?
>
> >>> Dhanji.
>
> >>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Dhanji,
>
> >>>> I am seeing warp-persist silently ignoring method-level @Transactional
> >>>> on classes created using @AssistedInejct. Can you please confirm this
> >>>> and suggest a workaround?
>
> >>>> Thank you,
> >>>> Gili
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
