On Mar 17, 5:58 am, James Strachan <[email protected]> wrote: > In attempting to implement it with Guice the main complication seems > to be using the extra development/production deployment annotation > matching stuff - which is quite handy - and that producer methods > don't have to be on a Module implementation (which is also useful).
The last time I looked, JSR 299 doesn't have the concept of a Module. Instead, the configuration uses classpath scanning, annotations and annotation-like XML. I anticipate that this may make testing cumbersome, but I haven't tried it. I'd be interested in seeing an unbiased comparison between Guice and JSR 299 for real-world apps. If anyone is interested in putting a document like that together, I volunteer to be a technical reviewer! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
