2009/3/30 Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>: > I don't think it's for lack of trying that there isn't a JSR. > Also we worked pretty hard to keep JAX-RS free of inventing it's own DI and > lifecycle which it was on the verge of doing (@Singleton, etc.). And am glad > to say that for the most part sense prevailed. > Most of this is just a fancy way of calling "new". Lately, Im beginning to > wonder if we really need a standards committee to arbitrate its cosmetics... > I'm sure that is not the popular view, however. > Dhanji. =)
IMHO we badly need some standard annotations to be able to add to objects which denote its injection points (optional + mandatory) with optional qualifiers and scopes along with optional lifecycle interfaces (which JSR 250 does a pretty good job of) - such that the object can be then injected in any framework without having to write custom providers/factory beans for each and every IoC framework. Or to put that another way; having a stand set of annotations will reduce the lock-in of Spring which seems to be used by pretty much all customers I work with in Enterprisey places. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
