Hi Folks, It's currently not possible to have an @Provides Provider<Foo> method in a Module (Guice throws an exception saying binding to Provider is not allowed). While technically this is achievable by having a class implement Provider & binding to the class, I find the shorthand of @Provides to be much much easier & simpler (with parameters passed into the method as dependencies, etc..). Would it be possible to relax that restriction and allow a binding to a Provider act the same as bind(..).toProvider(...)?
Thanks! Sam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
