Dhanji, Sam: thanks for sharing your ideas; I still can not come up with working example;
do you know if there is such piece of code anywhere? Andrei On Sep 22, 9:15 pm, "Dhanji R. Prasanna" <[email protected]> wrote: > You could do it by binding two different instances and using an instance > matcher. > > Dhanji. > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is actually a deficiency in the Binder API right now -- interceptors > > match based on Class (and Method), not Key. I looked into this a while ago > > when someone asked a similar question internally, and there didn't seem to > > be any reason within the implementation that it was limited to Class (as > > opposed to Key), but changing it to Key would be a clunky API change (it > > would require an additional method name... it can't be an overloaded method > > because the limitation on Class is in the generics, and the generic types > > would clash). > > > sam > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> The simple way to do it would be to bind the class to two different keys: > >> one which gets intercepted and one that doesn't. > > >> Dhanji. > > >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Pozolotin < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Hello; > > >>> SITUATOIN: > > >>> when I use guice aop interceptor for a class: > > >>> class Base { void call() {} } > > >>> the guice aop will use cglib to produce a proxy derived class, such > >>> as: > > >>> class Base&&EnhancerByGuice$$12345678 extends Base { void call() {} } > > >>> PROBLEM: > > >>> how can I call original Base.call() method and NOT EnhancerByGuice? > > >>> in the spirit of invokeSuper(): > > >>>http://cglib.sourceforge.net/apidocs/net/sf/cglib/MethodProxy.html#in...[]%29 > > >>> Thank you; > > >>> Andrei > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "google-guice" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > >>> . > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "google-guice" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > >> . > >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "google-guice" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
