just to clarify why "invokeSuper" exists: 1)
http://download-llnw.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/reflect/Method.html#invoke%28java.lang.Object,%20java.lang.Object...%29 "If the underlying method is an instance method, it is invoked using dynamic method lookup as documented in The Java Language Specification, Second Edition, section 15.12.4.4; in particular, overriding based on the runtime type of the target object will occur. " 2) http://blogs.sun.com/sundararajan/entry/calling_overriden_superclass_method_on On Sep 23, 1:50 pm, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> wrote: > not sure I follow re: two classes or two instances; > > I get only one instance of the instrumented class Base$$EnhancerByGuice > $$ > inside the MethodInterceptor.invoke(); > > now, I get "Method call = Base.call()" via reflection; > > all that is left is to do something like this: > > http://cglib.sourceforge.net/apidocs/net/sf/cglib/MethodProxy.html#in...[]%29 > > ((MethodProxy) call).invokeSuper(instance, args) > > -- the same way guice does this internally with cglib; > > but I see no way to find the underlying MethodProxy; > > please take a look on complete working example of what I am trying to > do: > > http://kenai.com/projects/guts/sources/code/show/trunk/guts-sandbox/g... > > thank you! > > On Sep 23, 1:35 pm, Andrei Pozolotin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Dhanji, Sam: > > > thanks for sharing your ideas; I still can not come up with working > > example; > > > do you know if there is such piece of code anywhere? > > > Andrei > > > On Sep 22, 9:15 pm, "Dhanji R. Prasanna" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You could do it by binding two different instances and using an instance > > > matcher. > > > > Dhanji. > > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This is actually a deficiency in the Binder API right now -- > > > > interceptors > > > > match based on Class (and Method), not Key. I looked into this a > > > > while ago > > > > when someone asked a similar question internally, and there didn't seem > > > > to > > > > be any reason within the implementation that it was limited to Class (as > > > > opposed to Key), but changing it to Key would be a clunky API change (it > > > > would require an additional method name... it can't be an overloaded > > > > method > > > > because the limitation on Class is in the generics, and the generic > > > > types > > > > would clash). > > > > > sam > > > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Dhanji R. Prasanna > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> The simple way to do it would be to bind the class to two different > > > >> keys: > > > >> one which gets intercepted and one that doesn't. > > > > >> Dhanji. > > > > >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Andrei Pozolotin < > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> Hello; > > > > >>> SITUATOIN: > > > > >>> when I use guice aop interceptor for a class: > > > > >>> class Base { void call() {} } > > > > >>> the guice aop will use cglib to produce a proxy derived class, such > > > >>> as: > > > > >>> class Base&&EnhancerByGuice$$12345678 extends Base { void call() {} } > > > > >>> PROBLEM: > > > > >>> how can I call original Base.call() method and NOT EnhancerByGuice? > > > > >>> in the spirit of invokeSuper(): > > > > >>>http://cglib.sourceforge.net/apidocs/net/sf/cglib/MethodProxy.html#in...[]%29 > > > > >>> Thank you; > > > > >>> Andrei > > > > >>> -- > > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > >>> Groups > > > >>> "google-guice" group. > > > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > > > >>> . > > > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > > >> -- > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > >> Groups > > > >> "google-guice" group. > > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >> [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > > > >> . > > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups > > > > "google-guice" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
