On Nov 25, 2010, at 10:44, jordi <[email protected]> wrote: > Where's Struts 2 Extension?
It was recently discontinued, which is why it's in the last zip but not trunk: http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1423 as for why it was discontinued, personally I don't know -- Cheers, Stuart > It's bundled in the .zip's but I can't find it in the Javadoc API pointed by > Guice30 wiki or in the source code via Google Code source browser > > jordi > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > wrote: > sorry if I misunderstood, I thought you was trying to make a pure > JSR330'ed implementation too :P > BTW you gave me a reply, thanks :) > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess I should underscore something :) We aren't limited by guice impl of > > 330 doesn't suggest we are not limited by 330 :) > > > > The JSR 330 spec is extremely limited, although it does keep most vendor > > injection annotations out of mainstream code. I haven't seen any evidence > > of further development of that spec, and I haven't checked to see if JSR 299 > > (CDI) handles optional injection better. > > > > jclouds tries to minimize usage of optional inject, but it does exist in a > > few classes. As 330 is written, it is really hard to swap out > > implementations anyway. For example, the wiring logic of our spring java > > config example is quite different than guice, and doesn't flow the same > > way. CDI (at least weld) seems to flow slightly differently, too. > > > > Quite frankly, the impact of guice not releasing anything damages my time > > and effectiveness much more than 330 has ever helped. > > > > my 2p. > > -a > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Adrian, > >> thanks for your reply :) I'm interested on wich workaround you adopted > >> for the @Inject(optional = true), can you point me please to some > >> sources? > >> Many thanks in advance! > >> Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi, Simone. > >> > > >> > One of the reasons jclouds really wants a guice release is that we've > >> > been > >> > jsr330ed for over a year now. There are holes in that spec like > >> > optional > >> > inject, but we are not limited by guice at the moment. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > -Adrian > >> > > >> > On Nov 24, 2010 12:56 PM, "Simone Tripodi" <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> Hi Adrian! :) > >> >> for what I can see on jclouds revisions, you updated the new guice > >> >> jars and ran existing code/tests using the new library, did you try to > >> >> JSR330'ing the code? I'm asking because I found some "issues", as I > >> >> previously wrote, and I'd like to get feedbacks/ share experience also > >> >> from other users. > >> >> Please let me know, thanks in advance! > >> >> Simo > >> >> > >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> >> http://www.99soft.org/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:59 AM, AdrianCole <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> +1 to release > >> >>> > >> >>> I've updated and tested jclouds with the current guice 3.0 snapshot. > >> >>> > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> -Adrian jclouds > >> >>> > >> >>> http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=413 > >> >>> > >> >>> On Nov 21, 12:27 am, Scott Hernandez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>> How should we report the good/bad, well I know where to report the > >> >>>> bad...? Just a response like this? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I rolled out the newsnapshotand it works for me, no problems (in the > >> >>>> first 3 minutes at least). > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > All, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > I've uploaded a new guice 3.0snapshot. Please see > >> >>>> >http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice30for new links and > >> >>>> > details > >> >>>> > of what changed since the lastsnapshot. Also see the rest of the > >> >>>> > page > >> >>>> > for > >> >>>> > a broad overview of new features since the 2.0 release, and the > >> >>>> > bottom > >> >>>> > of > >> >>>> > the page for notes about compatibility. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Please let us know how it works for you -- both good and bad! > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > Thanks! > >> >>>> > sam > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > -- > >> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >>>> > Groups > >> >>>> > "google-guice-dev" group. > >> >>>> > To post to this group, send email to > >> >>>> > [email protected]. > >> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >>>> > [email protected]. > >> >>>> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >>>> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >>> Groups > >> >>> "google-guice" group. > >> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >>> [email protected]. > >> >>> For more options, visit this group at > >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >> Groups > >> >> "google-guice" group. > >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> [email protected]. > >> >> For more options, visit this group at > >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "google-guice" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "google-guice" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "google-guice" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
