The struts2 extension included in guice2 was broken, and the workaround included on trunk had its own issues. sam
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 25, 2010, at 10:44, jordi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Where's Struts 2 Extension? > > > It was recently discontinued, which is why it's in the last zip but not > trunk: > > <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1423> > http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=1423 > > as for why it was discontinued, personally I don't know > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > > It's bundled in the .zip's but I can't find it in the Javadoc API pointed > by Guice30 wiki or in the source code via Google Code source browser > > jordi > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Simone Tripodi <<[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> sorry if I misunderstood, I thought you was trying to make a pure >> JSR330'ed implementation too :P >> BTW you gave me a reply, thanks :) >> Simo >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/> >> <http://www.99soft.org/>http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Adrian Cole < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > I guess I should underscore something :) We aren't limited by guice >> impl of >> > 330 doesn't suggest we are not limited by 330 :) >> > >> > The JSR 330 spec is extremely limited, although it does keep most vendor >> > injection annotations out of mainstream code. I haven't seen any >> evidence >> > of further development of that spec, and I haven't checked to see if JSR >> 299 >> > (CDI) handles optional injection better. >> > >> > jclouds tries to minimize usage of optional inject, but it does exist in >> a >> > few classes. As 330 is written, it is really hard to swap out >> > implementations anyway. For example, the wiring logic of our spring >> java >> > config example is quite different than guice, and doesn't flow the same >> > way. CDI (at least weld) seems to flow slightly differently, too. >> > >> > Quite frankly, the impact of guice not releasing anything damages my >> time >> > and effectiveness much more than 330 has ever helped. >> > >> > my 2p. >> > -a >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Simone Tripodi <<[email protected]> >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Adrian, >> >> thanks for your reply :) I'm interested on wich workaround you adopted >> >> for the @Inject(optional = true), can you point me please to some >> >> sources? >> >> Many thanks in advance! >> >> Simo >> >> >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/> >> >> <http://www.99soft.org/>http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Adrian Cole < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, Simone. >> >> > >> >> > One of the reasons jclouds really wants a guice release is that we've >> >> > been >> >> > jsr330ed for over a year now. There are holes in that spec like >> >> > optional >> >> > inject, but we are not limited by guice at the moment. >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > -Adrian >> >> > >> >> > On Nov 24, 2010 12:56 PM, "Simone Tripodi" <<[email protected]> >> [email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Hi Adrian! :) >> >> >> for what I can see on jclouds revisions, you updated the new guice >> >> >> jars and ran existing code/tests using the new library, did you try >> to >> >> >> JSR330'ing the code? I'm asking because I found some "issues", as I >> >> >> previously wrote, and I'd like to get feedbacks/ share experience >> also >> >> >> from other users. >> >> >> Please let me know, thanks in advance! >> >> >> Simo >> >> >> >> >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/<http://people.apache.org/%7Esimonetripodi/> >> >> >> <http://www.99soft.org/>http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:59 AM, AdrianCole < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> +1 to release >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I've updated and tested jclouds with the current guice 3.0 >> snapshot. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Cheers, >> >> >>> -Adrian jclouds >> >> >>> >> >> >>> <http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=413> >> http://code.google.com/p/jclouds/issues/detail?id=413 >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Nov 21, 12:27 am, Scott Hernandez <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> How should we report the good/bad, well I know where to report the >> >> >>>> bad...? Just a response like this? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I rolled out the newsnapshotand it works for me, no problems (in >> the >> >> >>>> first 3 minutes at least). >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> > All, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > I've uploaded a new guice 3.0snapshot. Please see >> >> >>>> > <http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice30for> >> http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice30for new links and >> >> >>>> > details >> >> >>>> > of what changed since the lastsnapshot. Also see the rest of >> the >> >> >>>> > page >> >> >>>> > for >> >> >>>> > a broad overview of new features since the 2.0 release, and the >> >> >>>> > bottom >> >> >>>> > of >> >> >>>> > the page for notes about compatibility. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > Please let us know how it works for you -- both good and bad! >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > Thanks! >> >> >>>> > sam >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > -- >> >> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> Google >> >> >>>> > Groups >> >> >>>> > "google-guice-dev" group. >> >> >>>> > To post to this group, send email to >> >> >>>> > <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> >>>> > <google-guice-dev%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> >>>> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> >>>> > <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> >>> Groups >> >> >>> "google-guice" group. >> >> >>> To post to this group, send email to >> <[email protected]>[email protected]. >> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> >>> <google-guice%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> >>> For more options, visit this group at >> >> >>> <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> >> Groups >> >> >> "google-guice" group. >> >> >> To post to this group, send email to >> <[email protected]>[email protected]. >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> >> <google-guice%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >> >> <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups >> >> > "google-guice" group. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > <google-guice%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> > <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> >> "google-guice" group. >> >> To post to this group, send email to <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> <google-guice%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> >> For more options, visit this group at >> >> <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "google-guice" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > <google-guice%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "google-guice" group. >> To post to this group, send email to <[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> <google-guice%[email protected]> >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> <http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
