On 6 Jul 2011, at 01:44, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 12:20 pm, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: >> 5) Make Guava an external dependency, since a lot of people already use >> Guava (leads to potential versioning issues) > > If we avoid @Beta APIs, the versioning downside of a direct dependency > on Guava is quite small. The Guava Authors have committed to keeping > all of their non-beta APIs for deprecation+18 months. > > I'm currently leaning towards shipping Guava as a public dependency. Yes, that would also be my preferred option - it seems odd to hide away a complete copy of Guava inside Guice when a lot of people will combine Guava+Guice anyway > Where that's a problem the application itself should use ProGuard or > jarjar to shrink their complete binary. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
