Ditto, happy to help where necessary.

Sam - any chance you could put a zip with your internal changes somewhere so 
that people can give them a spin while the git-sync is fixed?

--
Cheers, Stuart

On 1 Apr 2013, at 06:24, Tim Boudreau <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ping?
> 
> The offer of assistance stands...
> 
> -Tim
> 
> On Sunday, March 10, 2013 6:34:35 PM UTC-4, Sam Berlin wrote:
> There's a few minor changes we wanna put into trunk, and then I think we can 
> put a 3.1.0 RC out pretty easily.  Sorry for the troubles. :-/
> 
> The changes are basically:
> 
>    * Add some explicit @Inject constructors in the servlet extension (to play 
> better with requireAtInjectOnConstructors)
>    * Add a ScopingException subclass, thrown by the ServletScopes checkState 
> calls, to better identify failures.
>    * Update Guice to a new CGLIB that uses ASM4.
>    * Update ProvisionListener so it works with toInstance & bindConstant 
> bindings.
>    * Fix ContinuingServletHttpRequest to allow getCookies() to return null
>    * Change AssistedInject so it fails if it tries to construct a class that 
> has a scoping annotation (instead of ignoring the scope).
> 
> ... there's just some issues with our sync process that's delaying pushing 
> them out.  Once they're in git, I don't see any reason to delay an RC.  (We 
> might have to fix-up the poms, particularly for the cglib change.)
> 
>  sam
> 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Tim Boudreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a number of mini-frameworks that sit on top of Guice, and one of them 
> uses features only available in the Guice trunk.  I am really tired of 
> explaining to people why they need to use an unreleased trunk build of Guice 
> in production code, and have had to repeatedly set up continuous builds of 
> Guice on my and my customers' continuous integration servers.
> 
> If the trunk is so fabulously stable that no changes have been necessary for 
> an age, why not do a 3.1.0 release and get off the pot?
> 
> I don't want to just gripe about it - if there's any way I can contribute to 
> making that happen (resources, time, code, whatever), I will - just ask.
> 
> -Tim
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "google-guice" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "google-guice" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to