Interesting stuff, will definitely take a closer look. My first feeling about avoding annotations is mixed though. Especially the default constructor inspection feels strange: "By default the constructor with no parameters is selected (if available) or the 1st (in sequence of definition within the class) with any parameters." The ordering of constructors is a very subtle way to guide injection, i really like annotations for that. They are a bit more explicit. They serve as documentation and don't come with a runtime performance penalty. Just my personal feeling, and as I understood your documentation, adding annotations should be an easy addition if I desire to do so, right?
Greetings Willi PS: Sorry for posting this response to the guice mailing list, but I didn't find one for Silk (yet?). On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Jan Bernitt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:18:54 PM UTC+2, Christian wrote: > >> One remark is why Guice's version is 2.0? >> (3.0 was released a long time ago.) >> > OBS. I meant 3.x - Got confused by release talk going on in thr NG a while > ago. Will fix that. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
