On 05/04/13 13:11, Willi Schönborn wrote:
My first feeling
about avoding annotations is mixed though. Especially the default
constructor inspection feels strange:
"By default the constructor with no parameters is selected (if
available) or the 1st (in sequence of definition within the class) with
any parameters."
The ordering of constructors is a very subtle way to guide injection, i
really like annotations for that. They are a bit more explicit. They
serve as documentation and don't
come with a runtime performance penalty. Just my personal feeling, and
as I understood your documentation, adding annotations should be an easy
addition if I desire to do so, right?
This is about silk so we should move it to the new group - I add and
answer it there.
PS: Sorry for posting this response to the guice mailing list, but I
didn't find one for Silk (yet?).
True, created one: https://groups.google.com/group/silk-di
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
