I feel this is probably a newbie question.. But I have to admit I'm not sure how to approach the question:
I have two libraries : LibraryA and LibraryB. Both are implemented in separated projects (they are two different Maven artifacts, in my case). Each of those libraries is based on Guice and provides a Module class (extending AbstractModule) to bind its required dependencies. But LibraryA *requires LibraryB*, in that sense that LibraryA makes use of services provided by LibraryB. Therefore, LibraryB's Module should be installed, or at least all the dependencies it uses should be binded, for LibraryA to work. LibraryA is not "standalone" as it cannot work without LibraryB's dependencies being binded. My question : *What is the best way to express, in LibraryA's project, that LibraryB's Module must be installed?* - Should I simply document it? Tell the user that he has to install both an instance of LibraryA's Module and an instance of LibraryB's Module? - Should I add a LibraryB's Module parameter in LibraryA's constructor to force code using LibraryA to provide a LibraryB's Module, and then install it in LibraryA's Module? - Maybe I'm missing something simpler? Thanks for your help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
