I see this method doesn't do much, as it only calls *binder.getProvider(key) * so an exception is thrown if something is missing. Which is great... But I don't know, I feel something could be improved. A more obvious way to express the dependencies between the Modules themselves?
On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:20:16 AM UTC-4, scl wrote: > > There is a method requireBinding(Class) which lets causes the creation > of the Injector to fail if the binding is missing. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
