On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Brian Pontarelli <[email protected]>wrote:
> Cédric, > > Assuming you don't use setters, how do you test without an injector or > hacked up reflection? > Why would I test without an injector? That's the whole point. We test with TestNG (obviously) which supports Guice natively and we use what I believe are fairly common techniques, with a mix of mocks and fake objects and for our functional tests, production modules overridden with test ones. > field injection does not have the same guarantees from the JVM as > constructors. > I've been trying to get a concrete proof for that last statement (the theory indicates it should take about twenty lines to demonstrate) without much luck so far. I'm still hopeful to get one. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
