Why do this list even exists then ? Of course I was looking for a response and a solution, I was just a little surprised that people would spent more energy trying to look for errors in my code instead of addressing the issue. A simple "No, what you're trying to do is not possible, try alternatives"..would have been enough.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Christian Gruber <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm going to point out that "Google" doesn't ignore this thread - "Google" > as a corporation does not offer any guarantees or warrantees or > service-level-agreements with respect to Guice, which is clear in the > Apache license attached to every file. > > You asked a question on a developer community list, got answers, and you > didn't think those answers addressed your issue. Fair enough. Engineers > from Google and elsewhere who care about this framework, and who work very > hard (but are not being paid with a Guice support contract), have answered > your questions as best they can, but there is a disconnect. That happens. > It may not be resolvable if you want to use Guice in a different way than > how it was designed. They offered you alternative resources, and you have > those in hand. > > This list cannot be the place to teach someone Guice from whole-cloth. It > can contribute to someone learning how to use Guice, but there are patterns > for which Guice was intended, and things that are outside its scope or > design basis. Very experienced Guice developers are telling you you are > trying to do something in a way that Guice wasn't set up for. That is not > insignificant counsel. > > There are limits to what one can communicate over a mailing list of this > format. Please consider this, and consider how much un-obligated engineers > have spent of Google's (and other firms') salaried time to help you. > Certainly the matter isn't closed if there are any folks on this list who > wish to help... but I agree with Sam - StackOverflow is actually a much > better system than a mailing list to handle this sort of thing - as it has > better tools for expressing sample code, answers can be given and voted on > and commented. It is a reasonable suggestion to take the question to that > forum. Other Google projects (and also companies like Square, etc.) are > moving more and more of this sort of list discussion over to stack > overflow. Please do not consider it a brush off, but a sincere > recommendation of a more fruitful course of action. > > regards, > Christian. > > > On 8 Mar 2014, at 22:37, Mikkel Petersen wrote: > > Too bad this has to be unresolved. Google ignores it, for some weird >> reason. >> > > Christian Gruber :: Google, Inc. :: Java Core Libraries :: Dependency > Injection > email: [email protected] :::: mobile: +1 (646) 807-9839 > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "google-guice" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/google-guice/HMj5hmPjmR4/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Med venlig hilsen/Best regards Mikkel Petersen Jagtvej 82 4th 2200 København N Telefon 35 37 63 10 Mobil 91 97 03 64 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
