I am successfully using the Picasa 3.0 WINE-based package on my Fedora 12 x86_64 desktop.
It's Picasa, not WINE, that is the resource hog. A native Linux version of Picasa would not require significantly less resource than the WINE version does. The kind of stuff that Picasa does is heavyweight on any platform. It does a lot of CPU-intensive stuff, uses a lot of memory, and accesses the disk a lot. None of these would be different in a native port. jik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.
