Le 23/02/2010 23:21, Patrick Shanahan a écrit :
* Kent Tenney<[email protected]> [02-23-10 16:42]:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Shanahan<[email protected]> wrote:
I don't see this, picasa 3.6 is (a qualified) quite good.
I don't consider a Wine wrapper attractive.
but that is *personal* opinion....
Depending on your workflow, bibble5pro is quite better, but is proprietary.
Picasa3 has a major failing for those who shoot raw. It processess
images individually. One shooting any larger number of images would be
processing images forever. I shoot youth sports and have no problem
having to process 1600-2000 raw images for a weekend shoot. No way to do
this in Picasa. I would be spending all my time in front of a computer.
That's more images than most folks deal with.
A weekend party or vacation trip would have no problem generating
100-500 which would also be a *major-pain-in-the-ass* to deal with in
Picasa3.
I don't agree : I use Picasa 3.6 with the regular Ubuntu's wine without
problem, and on each of my trip, I come back with 500-700 pictures that
are flawlessly integrated with my albums, faces are well recognized and
sorted (well it's rather long at first run ...) but it is efficient.
Picasa3 is wonderful for 40-50 photos jpg or raw, but after that anything
more becomes a drag rather than enjoyment. Don't get me wrong, I like
much of what Picasa3 does, but it *is* quite limited. Most of the linux
offerings have the same one-at-a-time detraction and their batch modes do
not help as all photos get the same changes. I seldom have successive
photos which get the same lighting or crop or alighment or ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.
