On Oct 4, 1:58 pm, Furious Nomad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was careful when I worded my post to say 'available' data. I was > speaking from a purely objective standpoint. Google certainly has > more resources than geonames so I was wondering if they are interested > in this seemingly popular service.
The feature request: http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/list?can=2&q=reverse+geocoder&colspec=ID+Type+Status+Introduced+Fixed+Summary+Stars+ApiType+Internal&cells=tiles so far 12 people have starred it. If you add your vote, that will make 13 for this "seemingly popular service" -- Larry > > On Oct 4, 2:51 pm, "maps.huge.info [Maps API Guru]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It's not a matter of complete information, or information at all. It's > > a matter of providing a function or webservice. The data at geonames > > is downloadable, so you can create your own service if you want. > > > Google has not indicated they are going to do anything about creating > > a reverse geocoder, but then again, they never announce their > > intentions. The best advice I can give is to keep an eye on this forum > > for the announcement. > > > -John Coryat > > >http://maps.huge.info > > >http://www.usnaviguide.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
