Lan Yes I have, you are right,,, I spent some time learning html on W3C and I recon I am way over my head relating to Javascript...
In my case perhaps the basics is better than fighting the script from a position where I think I am understanding to... what on earth am I doing...!!! The tutorials by MIKE WILLIAMS are so simple to understand and gives a feel good factor when seeing how simple changes effect the outcome... Taking it to the next step I think requires a deeper understanding... Regards, Stephan On Oct 6, 12:14 am, Lan Mind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello smourt, > > I had many problems with javascript (still do on many web languages) > and I became very frustrated too. Maybe you've been through it already > but I found W3C tutorials very helpful for a beginner, and I still go > back and review the simplest things: > > http://www.w3schools.com/js/default.asp > > Seriously you won't regret spending time at W3C. > > On Oct 5, 2:55 pm, smourt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Whatever man, I am trying here.... there seriously is no attempt to do > > anything other than understand and learn if you feel the need to > > lambast me for... trying and trying to direct a question to the source > > of the tutorial... whatever...!!!! I will keep trying and when I > > succeed I'll post the resultant link... > > > Seriously? I am not about to get into a debate about whos has got a > > bigger... etc I have seen it so many times and refuse to get > > involved... > > > When you visit the photography forums I subscribe to I will be sure to > > not judge you and however misdirected your question... Lance I'll be > > sure to help... > > > Nothing more nothing less... > > > As for the previous link... I referenced it... What more do you want > > form me??? > > > As for your text above let me correct you... you are so quick to > > judge.... > > > I did supply a link to what is up till now been a stretch for me, my > > best effort, yet relative to most on this site, a pathetic effort. I > > did follow the guideline which stated I should NOT post code. I > > assumed referencing the code I have been working on would be better > > than what I kept messing up... > > > WHY WHY WHY Judge so harshly? Seriously? Who hurt you or offended you? > > > About the first thread... As stated, I linked to it, I felt that the > > people who did post replies were missing what I was trying to > > convey...I appreciated their attempt, dont get me wrong. > > > By directing the question to mike I assumed in the spirit of the forum > > he would have more than likely understood straight away and could/ > > would have directed me elsewhere on the forum which would have put me > > on the right track... > > > I take offence at being told I am in it for a freebie...I am happy to > > be proud of my own work and gaining a sense of achievement out of > > it... > > > LANCE in order to understand where you are coming from I looked at > > your most recent post... I am not suprised by the outcome... > > > You are criticising someone else...!!!! What's with that??? Let people > > be... help or dont help... no need to be a policeman when none is > > needed... Sure in many peoples opinion he was probably at fault... > > > What I find humourous, given the situation is that your respose to the > > post: > > > "v2.129e pushed as v2, v2.130d pushed as v2 - No changes yet Options" > > > is...be a policeman!!! > > > Chill man life is good... > > > To anyone else who chose to read to this point... I apologise if I > > offended you in any way...by handling it the way I have, sure I have > > not been particularly pleasant in response to Lance Dyas / Garthan > > (same person) I dont care much for the self elected policeman type... > > > To those who have contributed by trying to assist me, A BIG THANK > > YOU!!!! > > > By all means criticise me some more but I will not reply... Life has > > more pleasures... > > > On Oct 5, 3:33 pm, Lance Dyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > smourt wrote: > > > > By now I have no idea if it is a random typo or just not getting the > > > > concept. > > > > How do you expect anyone else to "guess" the above? > > > > "yeah you have a random typo on line 84 of your code mash because > > > you failed to understand javascript syntax regarding function nesting > > > and after you fix that your icons all will be same because you failed > > > to understand another concept which I could point to > > > in a third tutorial" but ... we cant do that > > > > Effectively you refuse to follow the group posting > > > guidelines .... and the new thread thing seems like > > > you are dodging the request by those who where > > > trying to help you on the first thread.... > > > > Causing probably a couple people to ask why > > > should I try to help? > > > > You do not provide anyone a link to your best attempt ... > > > You have only described what you need.. and not a problem. > > > So the best guess becomes you havent made any attempts > > > and simply want a difmff.("do it for me for free") > > > > that may not be true.. but you havent provided any > > > basis for someone to help you with a problem.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
