You're completely right. But, due I've reduced number of markers to 100, and anyway I've and display all 100 (AND geocoding), what do you suggest? Artificially introducing delays so not to exceed geocoding speed limit?
On 1 Dic, 14:35, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Be aware that most of your geocode requests are currently failing due to > the fact that you're exceeding the geocoding speed limit. Try opening > your page in two browser windows and observe that the pattern of markers > is very different. > > With 150 markers, once you switch to using the coordinates rather than > attempting to geocode, you should find the speed acceptable in browsers > other than MSIE. > > If you insist on having all 150 markers displayed simultaneously, then > using amarker managerwon't help. Marker managers and clusterers only > produce any advantage when they are configured to reduce the number of > markers that are simultaneously visible. > > --http://econym.org.uk/gmap > The Blackpool Community Church Javascript Team --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
