bratliff,
your poly.js. contains an array of an array.
var poly = [
[ point, point...]
]
I have a couple of WKT MULTIPOLYGONs. Is it OK to transcript those WTK
instances to your notation this way?
var poly = [
// Poly 1
[ point, point...],
// Poly 2
[ point, point...],
...
]
bratliff schrieb:
> OK - I have added the extra code.
>
> If first point == last point, it is considered to be a polygon.
>
> If first point != last point, it is considered to be a polyline.
>
> For a simple example, look at:
>
> www.polyarc.us/pack
>
> The Census Department's cartographic boundary files are pretty old. I
> am looking for something else which closely matches the coastline,
> perhaps the 2008 TIGER files.
>
> It is unfortunate the API "fromEncoded" functions will not accept an
> array of pixel offsets. Four redundant steps could be eliminated.
>
> Packer must convert from pixels to Lat/Lon coordinates.
> Packer must encode the Lat/Lon coordinates.
> The API must decode the encoded Lat/Lon coordinates.
> The API must convert from Lat/Lon coordinates to pixels.
>
> I have submitted suggestion 1007 but I doubt much will happen
>
> http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=1007
>
> I think the PolyGonzo guys have the right idea. The API GPoly
> functions are too bloated.
>
> >
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
