On May 12, 1:58 pm, jc_t_od <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for checking, I should have provided an example...here's an
> address that was returning a single placemark yesterday, but two
> today...
>
> 16034 Via Alamitos, San Lorenzo, CA 94580

http://www.geocodezip.com/example_geo2.asp?addr1=16034%20Via%20Alamitos,%20San%20Lorenzo,%20CA%2094580%20&geocode=1

And they are both accuracy 8...

Is the new one the "rooftop" geocode?

It is possible that that area just got rooftop geocodes and the
database hasn't had the duplicate addresses pruned out yet (just
speculating).

  -- Larry


>
>  - JC
>
> On May 12, 1:34 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 1:17 pm, jc_t_od <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Today we've noticed that the geocoder is returning two placemark
> > > objects when geocoding a single address, whereas previously it was
> > > only returning one. The difference between the two seems to be in the
> > > placemarks' ExtendedData['LatLongBox'] and Point['coordinates']
> > > objects. Is anyone else experiencing the same behavior?
>
> > > I've used maps.google.com and to look up both sets of coordinates -
> > > one appears to be the "rooftop" address and the other in the street
> > > next to the address. I'm wondering if the purpose might be to provide
> > > streetview data (i.e. for calculating street view pointing angles)?
>
> > Not for this 
> > address:http://www.geocodezip.com/example_geo2.asp?addr1=591%20Camino%20De%20...
>
> > Which is too far from the street to return a streetview "nearest
> > panorama".
>
> >   -- Larry- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to