Hi Rossko... that makes sense but
1) what is doing my head in is that the position of the markers is exactly the same... the only difference is the url location of the icons... Also... 2) Older versions of the same kml (same long and lat) display without the offset but new ones behave entirely differently with the offset. That is whats not making sense to me... On Oct 14, 8:00 pm, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > > Make sense? > > Yup. You're using KML. > No amount of fiddling with icon settings in javascript will change the > icons placed by GGeoXml. > It's controlled by <style> tags within the KML, with the limitation > that GGeoXml only places 32x32 icons > > More info > -http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API/browse_thread/thread/9...http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api/browse_thread/thread/4... > > If you want more flexibility with KML icons, consider using a > different parser - EGeoXml or GeoXml --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
