On Oct 19, 5:19 pm, Andrew Leach <[email protected]> wrote: > > But there is no referer for HTTP requests, so there is nothing for a > key to validate against.
There _can_ be a referrer, if you set it manually, but as implied in the emails I CC'ed you, I also fail to see the logic here. -- Marcelo - http://maps.forum.nu -- > Any abuse is linked to the account in the > key, which may be spoofed; so there is no security there either. > > I'm afraid this seems to be badly thought through (at best); and the > implementation is disastrous, especially since the last word on it > prior to making the change was "We won't be doing it". As Roberto has > indicated, most apps have some sort of lead time between development > and implementation. > > I fail to see the rationale in making the change. What am I missing? > > Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
