Hi Rossko, You're right, and I'll steer them in that direction. I never thought to think why they needed all that extra info, but now it seems like they were looking for a free way to get that data without paying for it. I'm not going to help if thats the case.
In regards to the private datasets, are you aware of any that do lat/ lng to addreses? So I might be able to point them in the right direction? Thanks for your comments. --Dan On Oct 21, 2:48 pm, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought this was against the TOC of google maps. > > It all depends ... so far you haven't mentioned anything to do with > maps, so it might well be against the terms. > Google is not the only > geocoder.http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api/web/resources-non-goog... > > Need to read all of the terms, example - > [Thou shalt not ...] > 10.9 use the Service or Content with any products, systems, or > applications for or in connection with: > ... > (c) dispatch ... > > > In either case, I'm not about to tell them how to do their job, its > > just something they want. > > It might be something they can buy. Then you can easily query a > private dataset for all-addresses-in-a-box. > It still seems upside down ; whatever route planning they are doing > only needs to consider the drop points, the other thousands of > addresses are completely immaterial. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
