Indeed. Of course, thy just switched v=2 to 2.193c and now I see a
whole load of different errors!

[Thu Dec 17 20:52:06 2009] psk-error: Error: 'null' is null or not an
object in function(a,b){var c=this.wu[b],d=K(c.x+a.lng()*this.yu
[b]);a=se(Math.sin(Qe(a.lat())),-0.9999,0.9999);b=K(c.y+0.5*Math.log
((1+a)/(1-a))*-this.zu[b]);return new S(d,b)}
[Thu Dec 17 20:52:06 2009] psk-error: in
http://maps.gstatic.com/intl/en_ALL/mapfiles/193c/maps2.api/main.js
($Date: 2009/11/28 14:11:51 $, GMap 2.193c) at line 600
[Thu Dec 17 20:52:06 2009] psk-error: User-agent: Mozilla/4.0
(compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6; .NET CLR
1.0.3705; Media Center PC 2.8; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

This update has also broken continuousZoom for me :-(   The behavior
of setUIToDefault also changed a bit, but I could fix that one easily.

Philip


On Dec 17, 11:28 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Dec 17, 8:01 am, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > If you look athttp://pond1.gladstonefamily.net/errorrate.pngthenyou
> > > can see the sort of trending information that I collect. The big spike
> > > was when google switched to 2.140g. The end of the spike corresponds
> > > to when I changed my code to work better with whatever change they had
> > > made in the 2.140g version. It also appears that the transition from
> > > 180e to 184a roughly halved the number of errors that I am seeing.
>
> > Not sure what you're expecting anyone to do about it.  It is not
> > uncommon that one version of the API may silently ignore programming
> > errors which another version doesn't.  Examples of that kind of thing
> > include : the use of string instead of number variable for
> > coordinates, non-integer values for zooms, etc etc.
>
> > To fix anything like that you need to look at the client side code, no
> > amount of studying graphs of error logs against API versions will fix
> > it for you.  You've already described that process yourself in
> > relation to 2.140g.
>
> I don't think he is expecting anyone to do anything about it (except
> perhaps google).  It looks like interesting data that could be
> valuable to the community.
>
>   -- Larry

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.


Reply via email to