On Jan 28, 11:10 am, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really don't care if it validates addresses or not. > > But if you want a 602 rather than a best-guess at making an address > out of some jumbled string, that's exactly what you are asking the > geocoder to do. And as you point out, other people don't want that to > happen. It ain't ever going to be an exact science.
No, you just don't understand. Nobody said anything about an exact science or even close to that. I repeat: "There already exists a line it won't cross in terms of result quality. I just think the line is too lenient. You don't. No problem." I know you realize that for some "jumbled strings" it returns nothing rather than a so called best-guess. This, even though I'm sure they could have found a word that matches something some where on the planet, they are Google for goodness sakes. So let's not act like they don't have any discernment at all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
