Many Thanks to both of You. That was really good lesson. I am satisfied. Regards
On 26 Mar, 23:18, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > But be aware that - > > > Take a look at this:http://www.healthypetmobilevet.com/area.shtml > > That doesn't use Directions to calculate travel charges, it does point- > in-polygon analysis of developer supplied areas. i.e. it doesn't use > any Google content as a basis to calculate charges. Might well be an > alternative approach for fuss. > > > You can certainly estimate taxi > > costs specific to some route for users. For example, > > see:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/interactives/taxifares/htt... > > Yup, both those provide a public facing free service, and estimate a > charge based on Google content. > In neither case do the providers use free Google content in their > _internal_ business processes e.g. billing, which seems to me to be > what the terms are driving at. > > I would say fuss' 1st case, which specifys billing, falls foul of > 10.9(c) " ... similar enterprise applications ..." > > I'm NOT a lawyer and not convinced it is forbidden, but I think there > is enough fuel there to fire doubts. Advice is as before, consult a > real lawyer. > > Some other consideration here > -http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api/browse_thread/thread/9... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
